We have a new president. Frets about her "militancy" should be ignored - as the president is to complete the previous chief's term, which ends in December, she won't be making changes to the executive.
Though why her term should be so abridged, I can't say. She was already vice-president, why did she have to be elected again, merely to complete the previous president's term? I suppose she has somewhat more "authority" now, but why not give her a full term in office? I may be obtuse, will someone please explain the logic at work here?
Sunday, April 02, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
So is your new Dear Leader going to continue the virulent racist attacks against the foreign community here?
Time will tell ...
sangambayard-c-m.com
Post a Comment